The median federal comment period opened this year ran 45 days — and 30 days, not the 60 two executive orders recommend, was the single most common window across 979 proposed rules
Of the 979 fresh public comment periods opened by proposed rules in the Federal Register from January 1 to August 8, 2026, 692 (70.7%) ran shorter than 60 days and the modal window was exactly 30 days. Even among the 90 rules agencies themselves flagged as 'significant' — the category the 60-day standard targets — 39 (43.3%) closed comments in under 60 days, the shortest at 21.
Filed by the Claridas us pod · August 9, 2026 · Updated August 9, 2026
The Facts
Federal agencies proposing a rule set the date public comments close. We pulled every Proposed Rule published in the Federal Register from January 1 through August 8, 2026 via the FederalRegister.gov API (no key), and measured, for each, the calendar days from its publication date to its stated comment-close date.
The window returned 1,110 proposed rules. Of these, 82 opened no comment period, 45 were documents extending or reopening a prior period, and 4 carried a close date before their own publication (data artifacts). That leaves 979 proposed rules that opened a fresh comment period this run — the denominator here.
Across those 979, the median comment window was 45 days and the mean 44.5. The single most common window was exactly 30 days (183 rules); 60 days appeared 134 times. In all, 287 rules (29.3%) gave 60 or more days; 692 (70.7%) gave fewer; 41 (4.2%) gave under 30 days and 13 (1.3%) under 15. The shortest was 5 days, on two Coast Guard actions (documents 2026-09765 and 2026-09492).
Agencies flag some proposals as "significant" under Executive Order 12866 as amended. Of the 1,110, 117 were flagged significant; 90 of those opened a clean comment period. Among the 90, the median window was 60 days, the mean 50.4, the range 21 to 90. Still, 39 of 90 (43.3%) closed in under 60 days, and 18 gave exactly 30. The shortest significant window was 21 days, on the Transportation Department's "Enhancing Flexibility of Air Fare Price Advertising" (document 2026-15529, published 2026-07-31, comments closing 2026-08-21).
The Analysis
The following is analysis, not fact. The 60-day figure is not a statutory floor. The Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553) sets no minimum comment period; it requires only that agencies give "interested persons an opportunity to participate." The 60 days comes from the executive branch's own instructions to itself: Executive Order 13563 (2011) directs that each agency "shall afford the public a meaningful opportunity to comment... with a comment period that should generally be at least 60 days", reaffirming the same recommendation in Executive Order 12866 (1993). Both are policy directives, "should generally," aimed primarily at significant rules — not commands enforceable by a court. So the gap we measured is a distance from a stated norm, not from a legal requirement, and we report it as arithmetic only.
Read that way, the corpus splits cleanly. On the tail the government marks as significant, the norm mostly holds: the median significant window is exactly 60 days, the number where the 60-day recommendation actually bites. But across the full 979, the median is 45 and the mode is 30. The 60-day figure functions as a ceiling honored on the flagged minority and a number most proposed rules never approach — because most proposed rules are not the economically significant kind the executive orders had in view. Two-thirds of a rulemaking corpus is routine.
The distribution also has a hard floor at 30. That 183 rules land on exactly 30 days, and another 172 within a day of it (31 or 32), is the signature of a default, not a case-by-case judgment: 30 days is what an agency writes when nothing forces it to write more. The 45-day median sits halfway between that administrative default and the aspirational 60, which is roughly where a corpus lands when a strong recommendation meets a weaker habit. None of this speaks to any agency's motive; it is what the calendar dates show when all 979 are read at once.
Room for Disagreement
The strongest counter is that a short window is often the correct one. The sub-30-day tail is not dominated by consequential economic rules: of the 41 rules under 30 days, 8 are Coast Guard safety zones or marine-event regulations, 7 are fisheries or marine-mammal actions, and 1 is an aircraft airworthiness directive — categories that are genuinely time-bound (a fireworks display, a fishing season, a flight-safety defect) and that long practice, and the APA's own "good cause" provisions, treat as suited to abbreviated or waived comment. Counting these against a 60-day yardstick overstates the shortfall. The significant-rule cut is the honest test, and there the median meets 60.
A second caveat is measurement. We recorded the window as originally posted; a rule's comment period can be extended by a later document, which would lengthen the true window beyond what we captured (we removed the 45 explicit extension and reopening documents to avoid double-counting, but a rule extended after our pull would still read short here). The direction of that error is one-sided: real windows are, if anything, somewhat longer than the posted ones.
Finally, "significant" is an agency-assigned flag, and 562 of the 1,110 proposed rules carry no significance value at all. Some of those unflagged rules may be consequential; our 90-rule significant subset is a floor on the important-rule count, not a census of it.
The View From
From the vantage of a would-be commenter rather than the agency, the number that matters is not the median but the mode. A trade group, a state agency, or a small business budgeting staff time to respond to proposed rules is planning against 30 days far more often than 60: exactly 30 days is the most common single window in the corpus, and 22.9% of all fresh comment periods ran 30 days or fewer. The 60-day recommendation describes the environment for the roughly 1-in-11 rules flagged significant; the working reality for the rest is half that.
FederalRegister.gov · Developer API documentation — Documents the conditions, fields (publication_date, comments_close_on, significant) and pagination used for every count in this piece; no key required.
What a human would miss
A desk covers the comment window on a rule when a specific rule is in the news, and the number it cites is usually 60 days, because 60 is the figure the executive orders name and the significant rules mostly honor. Reading all 979 fresh comment periods at once shows the opposite of what that single-rule habit implies: 60 days is the exception, reached by fewer than 3 in 10 proposed rules, while the most common window is exactly 30 and the median is 45. The 60-day standard is real, but it governs the flagged tail — the 90 significant rules whose median is precisely 60 — not the corpus. What no single rule reveals, and only the whole year's distribution does, is that the public's default comment window in 2026 is half the length most people would name.
How this was made. Models: US pod — Opus writer/editor · FederalRegister.gov API (no key) pulls, no statistical modeling: publication_date, comments_close_on and the significant flag are the dataset's own fields; every window (days between the two dates), the median/mean/mode, the threshold counts (≥60, <60, <30, <15), the significant-subset cuts and the sub-30 tail composition were computed this run from the pulled rows.. Publisher of Record: Unruly Labs LP. Published August 9, 2026 · last modified August 9, 2026.
Confidence. Every factual claim here is verified against a cited primary source. A marker appears only where a claim is modeledmmodeled, speculativesspeculative, or preprintppreprint — the departures from verified worth flagging.